Blaise Pascal, 17. századi francia gondolkodó személyében rendkívül eredeti módon ötvöződik az újkori természettudományos szemléletmód a hagyományos értelemben vett keresztyén, biblikus hittel. Tudományos hírneve már széles körben ismert, amikor 1654-ben, harmincegy éves korában megrendítő megtérés-tapasztalatban van része, amit a Mémorial szaggatott soraiban rögzít. A közvélemény ezt az eseményt tekinti élete fordulópontjának. Életrajzírói azonban ezt többnyire Pascal második megtéréseként említik, amit nyolc évvel korábban megelőz egy első.
Rendszeres Teológia
Blaise Pascal, 17. századi francia gondolkodó személyében rendkívül eredeti módon ötvöződik az újkori természettudományos szemléletmód a hagyományos értelemben vett keresztyén, biblikus hittel. Tudományos hírneve már széles körben ismert, amikor 1654-ben, harmincegy éves korában megrendítő megtérés-tapasztalatban van része, amit a Mémorial szaggatott soraiban rögzít. A közvélemény ezt az eseményt tekinti élete fordulópontjának. Életrajzírói azonban ezt többnyire Pascal második megtéréseként említik, amit nyolc évvel korábban megelőz egy első.
Baptism and Lord’s Supper are the oldest and most fundamental practices of the Christian Church. From the outset, the covenant has been very important for the foundations of the practice of child baptism. Today, the practice of baptizing children is called into question, because as autonomous individuals they do not have the opportunity to make their own decisions. What does this mean for the perception of baptism and the theology of baptism at a time when autonomy of the subject is paramount and the notion that one is part of a community plays much less of a role? Another question, which is being discussed to this day, is what happens when one is baptized. How is salvation mediated in the ritual? On the basis of central texts, a cross-section of the Reformed theology will be offered over the centuries.
The paper discusses the challenges of Christian identity in a (post)modern context in relation to fundamental elements of theology. It explores the role of doctrines in the life of the church, emphasising their importance in relation to worship and the authority of the Word of God. The paper highlights the importance of corporate identity as Christian and Reformed, emphasising the significance of cultural identity in the context of Christianity. It addresses the question of what makes the church and the conditions of being a church, reflecting on the essence of Christianity.
The objective of this study is not to provide an exhaustive theological analysis, but to explore the multifaceted implications—biblical, historical, theological, ecumenical, and ecclesiastical—that are essential for forming a well-rounded perspective on the contentious issue of rebaptism that has sparked considerable debate within our Church community.
Do Christians need to be socialists? Karl Barth and socialism. In this article, the author deals with a “shadow side” of the life and work of Karl Barth. From the perspective of many Eastern and Central European people who have experienced “real” socialism, the right to ask the question posed in the title is evident. It examines under what influences Karl Barth’s inclination towards social democracy and socialism arose. Three circumstances are mentioned: 1. The traditional Swiss solidarity and social sensitivity for the cause of the weak and oppressed.
John Chrysostom uses military metaphors from Romans to help believers un-derstand their relationship with God and engage in spiritual warfare. He compares circumcision and baptism to expand their meaning. By likening body parts to weapons, he teaches that individuals choose whether to serve truth or sin. In this analogy, God is the commander, and believers are soldiers fighting sin, stressing obedience and trust. Chrysostom urges obedience to God akin to soldiers obeying their leader, connecting it with faith-based trust.
My colleague Kees van der Kooi will say something about the “what” of our book the substance matter whereas I will try to explain its “why” and “how”: why did we write this book and how did we do it?